Can Decisions Be Made Outside a Booster Meeting?

In most booster organizations, official decisions should be made during a properly noticed meeting with quorum present. Decisions made outside a meeting — such as through private conversations, email threads, or informal agreements — are usually not considered binding unless the bylaws explicitly allow it.

When this boundary gets crossed, confusion and conflict often follow.

Why This Question Comes Up So Often

Booster volunteers are busy. Life moves fast. Urgent needs don’t always align with meeting schedules.

This question usually arises when:

A deadline is approaching
Attendance has been low
A quick answer is requested
A small group agrees privately
Someone says, “We already talked about this”

What feels efficient in the moment can create problems later.

What Typically Counts as an “Official Decision”

In most booster clubs, an official decision requires:

Proper notice of a meeting
Quorum present
Discussion during the meeting
A recorded vote or consensus
Documentation in meeting minutes

This process protects both the organization and the people volunteering their time.

Common Ways Decisions Get Made Outside Meetings

These situations are very common — and often well-intentioned:

Email chains among officers
Text message group chats
Conversations in the parking lot
“Everyone I talked to agreed”
Decisions announced after the fact

The problem isn’t communication — it’s authority.

When Decisions Outside Meetings Might Be Allowed

Some booster bylaws allow limited actions outside meetings, such as:

Emergency decisions
Electronic voting
Executive committee authority
Interim approvals between meetings

If allowed, these situations are usually:

Clearly defined in writing
Limited in scope
Documented afterward
Ratified at the next meeting

If your bylaws don’t clearly allow it, assume decisions should wait.

Why This Creates So Much Tension

Decisions made outside meetings often trigger strong reactions because:

People feel excluded
Transparency is lost
Trust erodes quickly
Volunteers feel sidelined

Even when no harm was intended, the perception of secrecy can be damaging.

What Happens If This Becomes a Pattern

Repeated off-meeting decisions can lead to:

Parent complaints
Board frustration
Leadership turnover
Meetings becoming reactive instead of productive

Over time, people stop engaging — not because they don’t care, but because they feel disconnected.

A Calm Way to Address This in the Moment

If a decision is presented as already made, steady language helps reset the room.

Helpful phrases include:

“Was this discussed in a meeting with quorum?”
“Can we bring this back for a formal vote?”
“I want to make sure everyone has a voice.”

This focuses on process, not blame.

If a Decision Has Already Been Made

If something has already moved forward:

Pause before reacting
Review bylaws calmly
Determine if the decision can be ratified properly
Focus on restoring clarity, not undoing people

Many issues can be resolved with transparency and a clean next step.

If This Feels Uncomfortable, That’s Understandable

If you’ve ever thought:

“This feels off, but I don’t want to rock the boat,” or
“I don’t want to be labeled difficult,”

You’re not alone.

Most people want clarity — not conflict.

A Grounded Next Step

When governance lines blur, slowing the moment before responding can prevent escalation.

SoundstageEDU built the Conflict Cooler to help parents and booster leaders pause, clarify what matters, and choose language that keeps trust intact — even when conversations are uncomfortable.

Structure doesn’t slow progress.

It protects it.

If you read this far, then sign up for our monthly newsletter!

SoundstageEDU

Building Better Fine Arts and Theater Tech Culture